- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Board action unauthorized as a matter of law concerning allegations of moral turpitude
- Separation of Powers Doctrine and Sovereign Immunity clarified
- Errors result in reversal of decision to prohibit further reinstatement applications by licensee
- Court of Appeal of Manitoba declined to challenge application judge’s decision
- Court held that the reasoning process for witness evidence admissibility was reasonable
The Nevada Supreme Court, in a September 10 decision, invalidated a law that prohibits courts from staying a decision of the state medical board while that decision is on appeal. The court held that the law unconstitutionally restricted the state’s courts (Tate v. State Board of Medical Examiners).
To read more, please subscribe.