- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Board action unauthorized as a matter of law concerning allegations of moral turpitude
- Separation of Powers Doctrine and Sovereign Immunity clarified
- Errors result in reversal of decision to prohibit further reinstatement applications by licensee
- Court of Appeal of Manitoba declined to challenge application judge’s decision
- Court held that the reasoning process for witness evidence admissibility was reasonable
A state appellate court in Mississippi upheld discipline imposed by the state's medical board on a doctor who supplied thousands of diagnoses to claimants in silicosis litigation. The diagnoses, the court held, were the product of patient-physician relationships (Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure v. Harron).
To read more, please subscribe.