- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- National board federation making accreditation decision does not act with state authority
- Casino magnate loses appeal of disciplinary ruling when he appealed initial, not final order in his case
- FAA revocation of commercial pilot reinstated after NTSB reduced discipline
- Court had discretion to withhold judgment on challenge of board authority until discipline charges against licensee resolved
- Board not required to name specific subsection of law in notice of discipline
In a rather complicated procedural case, an appeals court in Arizona ruled that a licensee who brought suit against the Arizona Board of Psychologist Examiners—seeking to prohibit it from opening a formal investigation based on an anonymous complaint regarding his practice—must allow a complaint screening committee formed by the board to evaluate the complaint, in order to decide whether the board should take up the case before the licensee can bring suit to stop it from going forward.
To read more, please subscribe.