- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Dental board could reasonably be deemed anti-competitive market actors
- Regulator’s decision to dismiss recordkeeping complaint without collecting records from licensee unreasonable
- Odd double procedural error halts appeal, but prevents dismissal of case
- Consent agreement placing licensee into inactive status during investigation was unauthorized
- Hearsay evidence allowed where exploited patient has died
The Oregon engineering board may not prohibit non-licensees from referring to themselves as "engineers,” a federal court ruled December 28, 2018 (Järlström v. Aldridge). The decision was in response to a suit brought by an unlicensed man who had been ordered by the board to stop referring to himself by that title as he urged the board to investigate the accuracy of red-light traffic cameras.
The judge in the case ruled that the term "engineer" is not exclusive to the . . .
To read more, please subscribe.