- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Licensee not entitled to appear in person at board’s deliberations to decide sanctions against her on remand
- Antitrust violations not necessarily crimes of moral turpitude
- Board lacked authority to discipline physician after license expired
- Sanction upheld for engaging, paying suspended fellow licensee as consultant
- MD’s standard-of-care defense not relevant to ruling on criminal sexual misconduct
When a Chase Amazon Visa card arrived in her mail in 2016, optometrist Nicole Mizrahi was surprised because she had never applied for the card. But the card's use of her maiden name was a tipoff, she eventually realized; the personal information she supplied to take her optometry licensure examination 18 years earlier was compromised, she believed, due to a data breach at the National Board of Examiners in Optometry (NBEO).
In a June 12 ruling, the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held . . .
To read more, please subscribe.