- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Board action unauthorized as a matter of law concerning allegations of moral turpitude
- Separation of Powers Doctrine and Sovereign Immunity clarified
- Errors result in reversal of decision to prohibit further reinstatement applications by licensee
- Court of Appeal of Manitoba declined to challenge application judge’s decision
- Court held that the reasoning process for witness evidence admissibility was reasonable
A federal court in Pennsylvania, in a September 26 decision, dismissed a complaint by several physicians unhappy with the re-certification process of the American Board of Internal Medicine, rejecting the plaintiffs' claims that the Board certification process is maintained as an improper monopoly and that the board makes misleading claims about the benefits of certification.
To read more, please subscribe.