- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- National board federation making accreditation decision does not act with state authority
- Casino magnate loses appeal of disciplinary ruling when he appealed initial, not final order in his case
- FAA revocation of commercial pilot reinstated after NTSB reduced discipline
- Court had discretion to withhold judgment on challenge of board authority until discipline charges against licensee resolved
- Board not required to name specific subsection of law in notice of discipline
The Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia, in a May 19 decision, rejected the argument of a psychologist that, although he had engaged in unprofessional conduct by having a sexual relationship with a patient, his actions should be mitigated by the fact of what he claimed was a blackmail scheme by that patient against him.
To read more, please subscribe.