- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Failure to cite professional code as evidence was error, but not fatal error
- Remote exam proctoring violates civil rights, California ACLU maintains
- FBI: Impostors posing as regulators threaten medical licensees nationwide with license suspension
- Case against board for refusal to retroactively renew license can continue
- Therapy degree is insufficient for general counseling license, but requiring degree to mention “counseling” is arbitrary
A California appellate court, in a September 13 ruling, reversed a decision by a lower court to alter a 2010 malpractice and fraud judgment which the state's medical board had relied upon to revoke the license of the doctor accused of malpractice. (Ralli v. Shahinian).
The disciplined doctor had convinced the lower court to alter the 2010 decision by introducing what he claimed was new evidence, unavailable at the earlier trial; the licensing board appealed and the appellate court overturned that holding . . .
To read more, please subscribe.