- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Children’s homes not required to obtain pharmacy licenses, court holds
- Explanation for refusal to reinstate license not required, court says
- Though hearsay, script for pharmacist’s fraudulent calls held acceptable evidence in revocation proceeding
- Licensee’s age and threat to his practice held to justify stay of suspension
- Board members’ exposure to facts in proposed consent order not sufficient to show bias
A California appellate court, in a September 13 ruling, reversed a decision by a lower court to alter a 2010 malpractice and fraud judgment which the state's medical board had relied upon to revoke the license of the doctor accused of malpractice. (Ralli v. Shahinian).
The disciplined doctor had convinced the lower court to alter the 2010 decision by introducing what he claimed was new evidence, unavailable at the earlier trial; the licensing board appealed and the appellate court overturned that holding . . .
To read more, please subscribe.