- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Lenient discipline overturned because tribunal did not include required layperson
- Interim suspension order overturned for reliance on dated allegations
- Court affirms decision that attorney inappropriately engaged in legal practice by managing his law firm during suspension
- Decision to forgo further discipline returned to regulator for lack of explanation
- Licensee may challenge age disenrollment in court
A policy prohibiting licensees from using the terms "osteopractice" and "osteopractor" was a regulation, and a district court wrongly granted a motion to dismiss a complaint about the regulation, the Supreme Court of Nevada held May 26 (Dunning v. Nevada State Board of Physical Therapy Examiners
). The unpublished opinion reversed a district court's dismissal of the physic- cian's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and remanded the case.
To read more, please subscribe.