Ban on coined terms is a regulation, and is appealable, court finds
A policy prohibiting licensees from using the terms "osteopractice" and "osteopractor" was a regulation, and a district court wrongly granted a motion to dismiss a complaint about the regulation, the Supreme Court of Nevada held May 26 (Dunning v. Nevada State Board of Physical Therapy Examiners). The unpublished opinion reversed a district court's dismissal of the physic- cian's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and remanded the case.
To read more, please subscribe.