- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Licensee not entitled to second evidentiary hearing after 11 years of procedural up-and-downs
- Discipline upheld against psychologist who gave patient file to opposing counsel in lawsuit
- Complainant cannot force board to let him testify against licensee
- Formal recommendation by hearing examiner not required in order to revoke a license
- Licensee cannot dodge obligation to adhere to trade standards through provision in contract with customer
For many pharmacist candidates, it was the last step on the road to a pharmacy license. But unfortunately, when thousands of people took the California Practice Standards and Jurisprudence Standards in late July, a problem arose.
Allegations that more than 100 questions, along with answers, had been exposed online in advance, surfaced and proved correct. The state Board of Pharmacy was faced with a difficult choice.
The board launched an investigation about the alleged leak and announced that exam scores would not be released. While . . .
To read more, please subscribe.