- Automatic expungement trend gives clean slate to license applicants facing criminal background checks
- Board hid investigators’ actual caseload with fake data for Auditor
- Children’s homes not required to obtain pharmacy licenses, court holds
- Explanation for refusal to reinstate license not required, court says
- Though hearsay, script for pharmacist’s fraudulent calls held acceptable evidence in revocation proceeding
- Licensee’s age and threat to his practice held to justify stay of suspension
- Board members’ exposure to facts in proposed consent order not sufficient to show bias
For many pharmacist candidates, it was the last step on the road to a pharmacy license. But unfortunately, when thousands of people took the California Practice Standards and Jurisprudence Standards in late July, a problem arose.
Allegations that more than 100 questions, along with answers, had been exposed online in advance, surfaced and proved correct. The state Board of Pharmacy was faced with a difficult choice.
The board launched an investigation about the alleged leak and announced that exam scores would not be released. While . . .
To read more, please subscribe.